[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4752: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4754: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4755: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4756: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
Racing Fuel Systems • View topic - Holley cfm selection

Holley cfm selection

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby hysteric » Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:40 am

hysteric
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2020 12:06 am

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby Right hand drive » Tue Feb 09, 2021 5:34 am

Last edited by Right hand drive on Tue Feb 09, 2021 6:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Right hand drive
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:54 am
Location: Victoria Australia

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby hysteric » Tue Feb 09, 2021 6:24 am

hysteric
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2020 12:06 am

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby Right hand drive » Tue Feb 09, 2021 6:49 am

Apologies hysteric, I have just edited my above post for clearer explanation while you were replying to it.

Definitely not enough difference in the test carbies to spend the coin changing out carbs. But useful info if you were in the market for a new one.

Just read through the entire article again. A little bit of credibility lost when they say they are going up in size from the 830 to 950.

I agree that atomization and therefore vaporization is easier with smaller venturi carburetors, yet larger and assumed lesser atomization and vaporization are making more power. Are there modern booster designs out there other than the large annular that atomize better allowing for increased cfm?
Right hand drive
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:54 am
Location: Victoria Australia

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby Right hand drive » Tue Feb 09, 2021 7:24 am

From Vizard


Image


Fig. 6.15. Dyno tests support my “think bigger” philosophy when using a flow-efficient, dual–plane intake. The relatively basic 383 test engine has a set of Gil Mink–ported World Products Sportsman iron heads with a 10.5:1 CR. The cam is one of my hot street-spec hydraulic flat-tappet grinds. As you can see, it produces 536 hp and that’s pretty respectable output for an engine like this. Most engines with this sort of spec don’t make that high an output with a single-plane race-style intake.

The point, however, is that if the typically recommended 750 carb had been used, the output peaks would have been 476 ft-lbs of torque and 511 hp. Although that’s hardly an output that anyone would complain about, it is not the 487 ft-lbs and 536 hp seen with the big carb. A couple of points to note to validate the results here are that the intake had no plenum cutout and the torque curves of all three carbs were virtually identical up to 4,000 rpm.


The blanket statement made on review of these results is throttle response would suffer without any supporting data other than hypothesis.

Back to my original question: how do you hone in on cfm for your combo?
Right hand drive
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:54 am
Location: Victoria Australia

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby hysteric » Tue Feb 09, 2021 7:33 am

Have you seen the price of HP's lately? That was an expensive test if they didn't get the carbs for free or heavily discounted.

Not sure on the boosters but a stepped downleg may be the way to go for more flow and decent atomization. You could try using smaller diameter boosters on a bigger venturi to pick up some of the the signal you lose but I have never done it to really know. I picked up a Holley 650 HP main body when they were cheap :roll: to try so I might get the chance before I go back to the TQ's Not sure there's much you can do with a Holley to get better atomization as opposed to other designs
hysteric
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2020 12:06 am

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby hysteric » Tue Feb 09, 2021 7:37 am

What happens before 4000 RPM though?
hysteric
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2020 12:06 am

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby hysteric » Tue Feb 09, 2021 7:41 am

hysteric
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2020 12:06 am

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby Right hand drive » Tue Feb 09, 2021 8:06 am

Right hand drive
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:54 am
Location: Victoria Australia

Re: Holley cfm selection

Postby Right hand drive » Tue Feb 09, 2021 8:15 am

Right hand drive
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:54 am
Location: Victoria Australia

PreviousNext

Return to Holley

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron