[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4752: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4754: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4755: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4756: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
Racing Fuel Systems • View topic - Q-jet secondary question

Q-jet secondary question

Q-jet secondary question

Postby novadude » Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:06 pm

Seems like nobody posts on this forum, but here it goes anyway...

Let's say you have a fixed hanger and secondary metering rod combination. How does the air door spring setting affect WOT A/F ratio?

It seems like going tighter on the spring would tend to make things richer, but I am also thinking about how the cam lifts the metering rods higher with more opening.

So, on one hand, you get more jet area with the door opening sooner, but on the other hand you probably have less "venturi" signal when the air door flops open early. Anyone have any real world experience they can share? Plan to do my own tests, but curious what others have found.
novadude
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:55 pm

Re: Q-jet secondary question

Postby rgalajda » Sat Oct 22, 2022 12:04 pm

Once the secondary air flap/door is wide open there is no difference to WOT AF ratio, if it has recovered from opening too soon or too late.

If the air door opens too soon you create a bog. Initial lean spot.
If the air door opens too late you could have a loss of power production/torque.

It gets more complicated.
The choke pull off release time also has an effect here because it is connected to the secondary air door.
Not all secondary air doors open to the same distance. This varies the cfm.
Some truck quadrajets open the secondary butterflies at a later position. They use a different linkage.

Here is an example. 750 quadrajet 350 HP sbc such as 1969 Corvette 350/350HP
Air door full open distance 1.36 inches
Secondary flap spring : 3/4 to 7/8 initial wind up
Choke pull off release time : 2 to 3 seconds
Secondary rod BG .400” medium length tip

If secondary door opens too soon/fast the bog is created because fuel is heavier than air. So you have a sudden lean condition until it recovers. Sudden flopping open without control and it may not recover.

Quadrajet carbs do have a secondary pull over enrichment system when the secondary air door opens.
This system can be tailored somewhat .

I have worked on a lot of quadrajets, and I keep detailed records of each carb.
I don’t no if this helps your question , hopefully it does.
rgalajda
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2021 8:21 am
Location: Ontario,Canada

Re: Q-jet secondary question

Postby novadude » Mon Oct 24, 2022 1:42 pm

Thanks. I think I understand all of that, but my question was more around what happens in the period between the air-door being closed and the air door being fully open.

As you said, that is controlled by the spring and vacuum break. Intuitively, one would think that tighter spring and/or slower break would be richer at all "in between" positions of the air-door. However, I think that rod taper from ~0.134 to the power tip also greatly influences what happens in the "middle" positions.

I think I'll play with various spring settings while keeping rods and hangers constant and see what happens.
novadude
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:55 pm

Re: Q-jet secondary question

Postby rgalajda » Mon Oct 24, 2022 2:47 pm

"I think that rod taper from ~0.134 to the power tip also greatly influences what happens in the "middle" positions. "

I see what you mean. For example the .0400" tip rod was available in short , medium, and long tip lengths. At say 60 degree opening of the air door this varied the rod diameter in the secondary jet on these different tip lengths from about .0800 to .1090 according to a chart I have.

Interestingly the short and medium tip lengths were considered better for most street use , giving a clean crisp transition.

Looking forward to your test results.
May I ask what quadrajet number you are working with?
rgalajda
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2021 8:21 am
Location: Ontario,Canada

Re: Q-jet secondary question

Postby novadude » Thu Oct 27, 2022 4:00 pm

It's a 17080204 (small "750" primary venturi), but nowhere close to stock. 0.046 main bleeds (not the 0.120 this unit came with), the "tuner" secondary mods from the old "racing fuel systems" board, Upper IAB relocated to airhorn, etc, etc.
novadude
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:55 pm

Re: Q-jet secondary question

Postby 77cruiser » Fri Oct 28, 2022 3:53 am

Mine goes rich 11 on secondary opening if I have the spring much tighter than 1/2 turn.
77cruiser
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 4:34 pm

Re: Q-jet secondary question

Postby novadude » Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:15 pm

novadude
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:55 pm

Re: Q-jet secondary question

Postby 77cruiser » Sun Oct 30, 2022 4:36 am

Have you tried loosening it about an 1/8 turn?
77cruiser
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 4:34 pm

Re: Q-jet secondary question

Postby 77cruiser » Sun Oct 30, 2022 3:41 pm

One of the runs that recorded from a few years ago at the track. Not a very flat AFR curve.

run3.jpg
77cruiser
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 4:34 pm

Re: Q-jet secondary question

Postby novadude » Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:51 pm

Am I reading that right? You are hitting high / mid 13 A/F right before (or after) the gear change?

I haven't played with air door tension yet, but I will probably try your suggestion of backing it off 1/8 turn and see what happens. I really need to datalog... too hard to read the gauge and drive at WOT at the same time.
novadude
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:55 pm

Next

Return to Rochester

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests