[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4752: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4754: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4755: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4756: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
Racing Fuel Systems • View topic - .500” I/D annular boosters in 4150

.500” I/D annular boosters in 4150

.500” I/D annular boosters in 4150

Postby Right hand drive » Sun Aug 07, 2022 1:20 pm

As per title how would .500” I/D annular boosters go in 4150 carbs, specifically 1.56” venturi?

From what I have investigated they have less signal to main well than .600” I/D but would this be of detriment in a street strip deal?
Right hand drive
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:54 am
Location: Victoria Australia

Re: .500” I/D annular boosters in 4150

Postby rgalajda » Wed Aug 10, 2022 10:39 am

What/who's booster? Do you mean less signal than .600" I/D annular booster ?
rgalajda
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2021 8:21 am
Location: Ontario,Canada

Re: .500” I/D annular boosters in 4150

Postby Right hand drive » Wed Aug 10, 2022 12:42 pm

These

Image

Image

Already have some in a main body but haven’t tried them yet

Image

Just curious and what to expect on how they would differ from .600” i/d annulars in a 4150 as I have only had the .600” before.
Right hand drive
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:54 am
Location: Victoria Australia

Re: .500” I/D annular boosters in 4150

Postby rgalajda » Thu Aug 11, 2022 9:23 am

In general terms Yes. But could have a better signal than a down leg booster. As some guys on here like Mike/Mark may have stated before there is more to a booster in terms of signal than just size. Form/contour/shape number of holes. Proper atomization of fuel in a 1.56" venturi street carb , with no intake heat, is a concern.
rgalajda
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2021 8:21 am
Location: Ontario,Canada

Re: .500” I/D annular boosters in 4150

Postby jmarkaudio » Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:00 am

.500 annulars will flow less and signal less than the .600's, but better signal than a downleg. I only used a .500 when the fuel channel was too small with the .600's, usually a boosted app and usually alcohols. I now have some .610's that will handle about 700HP worth of methanol, above that I have a .545 that will cover it. And there are some things you can do to improve that, cutting a channel inside the banjo will add more capability. A stock 4150 annular banjo has little room or strength to cut much, some of the newer billet components will add more.
User avatar
jmarkaudio
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:14 pm

Re: .500” I/D annular boosters in 4150

Postby Right hand drive » Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:41 am

Right hand drive
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 11:54 am
Location: Victoria Australia

Re: .500” I/D annular boosters in 4150

Postby jmarkaudio » Wed Aug 24, 2022 12:42 am

Fuel curve will depend on emulsion setup and main air bleed size. distribution will be better, if it needs it they may help.
User avatar
jmarkaudio
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:14 pm


Return to Holley

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests